<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Find Out Which Version of Linux You Are Running</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nerdboys.com/2008/03/14/how-to-find-out-which-version-of-linux-you-are-running/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nerdboys.com/2008/03/14/how-to-find-out-which-version-of-linux-you-are-running/</link>
	<description>Tech tips, news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:35:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nerdboys.com/2008/03/14/how-to-find-out-which-version-of-linux-you-are-running/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jojosoho.com/?p=37#comment-125</guid>
		<description>I used this method on debian-etch 2.6.18-6 and of course it worked fine. One interesting point is why I wanted to know. I had a funny situation where I had done an update thru synaptic with no problems. The update included the next version of the kernel. So when I rebooted to let the update take effect, it didnt reboot, but instead gave me an error message saying the kernel image was corrupted(the check sum didnt match). Then I rebooted to the previous version -5,which was still ok. After that I wanted to record all the error messages so I rebooted to -6 expecting it to fail as before. But no, it booted with no problems which left me mystified. So, finally, here&#039;s the point. I wanted to know for sure what version I was running and it was -6. Now my mind is at ease. I am sure I am back to the correct version. Thanks very much. It is very useful to know where you are and what&#039;s what.&lt;br/&gt;Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used this method on debian-etch 2.6.18-6 and of course it worked fine. One interesting point is why I wanted to know. I had a funny situation where I had done an update thru synaptic with no problems. The update included the next version of the kernel. So when I rebooted to let the update take effect, it didnt reboot, but instead gave me an error message saying the kernel image was corrupted(the check sum didnt match). Then I rebooted to the previous version -5,which was still ok. After that I wanted to record all the error messages so I rebooted to -6 expecting it to fail as before. But no, it booted with no problems which left me mystified. So, finally, here&#8217;s the point. I wanted to know for sure what version I was running and it was -6. Now my mind is at ease. I am sure I am back to the correct version. Thanks very much. It is very useful to know where you are and what&#8217;s what.<br />Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nerdboys.com/2008/03/14/how-to-find-out-which-version-of-linux-you-are-running/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jojosoho.com/?p=37#comment-124</guid>
		<description>very useful.&lt;br/&gt;Tried it and it works fine with SuSE too.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Tachyon&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;# lsb_release -a&lt;br/&gt;LSB Version:    core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-noarch:core-2.0-x86_64:core-3.0-x86_64:desktop-3.1-amd64:desktop-3.1-noarch:graphics-2.0-amd64:graphics-2.0-noarch:graphics-3.1-amd64:graphics-3.1-noarch&lt;br/&gt;Distributor ID: SUSE LINUX&lt;br/&gt;Description:    openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64)&lt;br/&gt;Release:        10.2&lt;br/&gt;Codename:       n/a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very useful.<br />Tried it and it works fine with SuSE too.</p>
<p>Tachyon</p>
<p># lsb_release -a<br />LSB Version:    core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-noarch:core-2.0-x86_64:core-3.0-x86_64:desktop-3.1-amd64:desktop-3.1-noarch:graphics-2.0-amd64:graphics-2.0-noarch:graphics-3.1-amd64:graphics-3.1-noarch<br />Distributor ID: SUSE LINUX<br />Description:    openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64)<br />Release:        10.2<br />Codename:       n/a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuong Bui</title>
		<link>http://nerdboys.com/2008/03/14/how-to-find-out-which-version-of-linux-you-are-running/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuong Bui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jojosoho.com/?p=37#comment-123</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so greats! Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so greats! Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nerdboys.com/2008/03/14/how-to-find-out-which-version-of-linux-you-are-running/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jojosoho.com/?p=37#comment-122</guid>
		<description>It&#039; s was very usefull. There can be implemented some explenation, and one of them is how to recognize bit version of instaltation (usally in the name of kernel vesrion).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Best regards,&lt;br/&gt;Petar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217; s was very usefull. There can be implemented some explenation, and one of them is how to recognize bit version of instaltation (usally in the name of kernel vesrion).</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />Petar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
